UPSC Exams
Latest Update
Coaching
UPSC Current Affairs
Syllabus
UPSC Notes
Previous Year Papers
UPSC Mains Previous Year Question Papers Last 25 Years UPSC Prelims Question Papers Last 10 Years UPSC Question Papers UPSC CSE Prelims 2025 Question Paper UPSC Mains 2024 Model Answers UPSC 2024 Question Papers UPSC 2023 Question Papers UPSC 2022 Question Papers UPSC 2021 Question Papers UPSC 2020 Question Papers UPSC 2019 Question Papers UPSC 2018 Question Papers UPSC 2017 Question Papers UPSC 2016 Question Papers UPSC 2015 Question Papers UPSC 2014 Question Papers UPSC CSAT Question Papers UPSC IFS Previous Year Paper UPSC Assistant Labour Commissioner Previous Question Year Papers UPSC Combined Geo Scientist Previous Year Paper UPSC APFC Previous Year Question Papers UPSC CMS Previous Year Question Paper UPSC EPFO Previous Year Paper UPSC Air Safety Officer Previous Year Papers UPSC SO Steno Previous Year Paper UPSC IES ISS Previous Year Question Papers
Mock Tests
UPSC Editorial
Bilateral Ties
Albania India Relations India Algeria Relations Andorra India Relations India Angola Relations India Antigua Barbuda Relations India Argentina Relations Austria India Relations India Azerbaijan Relations Bahamas India Relations India Bahrain Relations Barbados India Relations India Belarus Relations Belgium India Relations Belize India Relations Benin India Relations Bolivia India Relations India Bosnia Herzegovina Relations India Botswana Relations Brazil India Relations Brunei India Relations Bulgaria India Relations Burundi India Relations Cabo Verde India Relations India Cambodia Relations India Cameroon Relations Canada India Relations India Cayman Islands Relations India Central African Republic Relations India Chad Relations Chile India Relations India Colombia Relations India Comoros Relations India Democratic Republic Of The Congo Relations India Republic Of The Congo Relations India Cook Islands Relations India Costa Rica Relations India Ivory Coast Relations India Croatia Relations India Cyprus Relations India Czech Republic Relations India Djibouti Relations India Dominica Relations India Dominican Republic Relations India Ecuador Relations India El Salvador Relations India Equatorial Guinea Relations India Eritrea Relations Estonia India Relations India Ethiopia Relations India Fiji Relations India Finland Relations India Gabon Relations India Gambia Relations India Georgia Relations Germany India Relations India Ghana Relations India Greece Relations India Grenada Relations India Guatemala Relations India Guinea Relations India Guinea Bissau Relations India Guyana Relations India Haiti Relations India Holy See Relations India Honduras Relations India Hong Kong Relations India Hungary Relations India Iceland Relations India Indonesia Relations India Iran Relations India Iraq Relations India Ireland Relations India Jamaica Relations India Kazakhstan Relations India Kenya Relations India Kingdom Of Eswatini Relations India Kiribati Relations India Kuwait Relations India Kyrgyzstan Relations India Laos Relations Latvia India Relations India Lebanon Relations India Lesotho Relations India Liberia Relations Libya India Relations Liechtenstein India Relations India Lithuania Relations India Luxembourg Relations India Macao Relations Madagascar India Relations India Malawi Relations India Mali Relations India Malta Relations India Marshall Islands Relations India Mauritania Relations India Micronesia Relations India Moldova Relations Monaco India Relations India Montenegro Relations India Montserrat Relations India Morocco Relations Mozambique India Relations India Namibia Relations India Nauru Relations Netherlands India Relations India Nicaragua Relations India Niger Relations India Nigeria Relations India Niue Relations India North Macedonia Relations Norway India Relations India Palau Relations India Panama Relations India Papua New Guinea Relations India Paraguay Relations Peru India Relations India Philippines Relations Qatar India Relations India Romania Relations Rwanda India Relations India Saint Kitts And Nevis Relations India Saint Lucia Relations India Saint Vincent And Grenadines Relations India Samoa Relations India Sao Tome And Principe Relations Saudi Arabia India Relations India Senegal Relations Serbia India Relations India Sierra Leone Relations India Singapore Relations India Slovak Republic Relations India Slovenia Relations India Solomon Islands Relations Somalia India Relations India South Sudan Relations India Spain Relations India Sudan Relations Suriname India Relations India Sweden Relations India Syria Relations India Tajikistan Relations Tanzania India Relations India Togo Relations India Tonga Islands Relations India Trinidad And Tobago Relations India Tunisia Relations India Turkmenistan Relations India Turks And Caicos Islands Relations India Tuvalu Relations India Uganda Relations India Ukraine Relations India Uae Relations India Uruguay Relations India Uzbekistan Relations India Vanuatu Relations India Venezuela Relations India British Virgin Islands Relations Yemen India Relations India Zambia Relations India Zimbabwe Relations
Books
Government Schemes
Production Linked Incentive Scheme Integrated Processing Development Scheme Rodtep Scheme Amended Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme Saathi Scheme Uday Scheme Hriday Scheme Samagra Shiksha Scheme India Nishta Scheme Stand Up India Scheme Sahakar Mitra Scheme Mdms Mid Day Meal Scheme Integrated Child Protection Scheme Vatsalya Scheme Operation Green Scheme Nai Roshni Scheme Nutrient Based Subsidy Scheme Kalia Scheme Ayushman Sahakar Scheme Nirvik Scheme Fame India Scheme Kusum Scheme Pm Svanidhi Scheme Pmvvy Scheme Pm Aasha Scheme Pradhan Mantri Mahila Shakti Kendra Scheme Pradhan Mantri Lpg Panjayat Scheme Mplads Scheme Svamitva Scheme Pat Scheme Udan Scheme Ek Bharat Shresth Bharat Scheme National Pension Scheme Ujala Scheme Operation Greens Scheme Gold Monetisation Scheme Family Planning Insurance Scheme Target Olympic Podium Scheme
Topics

Hunter Commission - Modern History Notes for UPSC

Last Updated on Jul 01, 2024
Download As PDF
IMPORTANT LINKS

The Hunter Commission was formed in 1882 under the chairmanship of Sir William Hunter. This Commission was appointed by Lord Ripon who was the viceroy of India in 1882. This Commission was officially formed on 3rd April 1882 after a request was received by Lord Ripon from the general Council of Education to form a Commission to give recommendations on the education sector in India. Thus, the Hunter Commission is one of the most important topics for UPSC IAS Examination.

In this article on the Hunter Commission, we shall discuss its background, recommendations and significance . This will be very useful for aspirants in the UPSC Prelims Exam.

Also, study the NCERT Notes on Charter Act of 1833 from the linked article.

Hunter Commission (UPSC Modern History): Download PDF Here!

About Sir William Hunter:
  • Sir William Hunter was Indian Civil Servant and also a member of the viceroy's executive Council.
  •  He was born on 15th July 1840 in Glasgow, Scotland and he obtained his education from the ‘Quicker Seminary’ at Queenswood, Hampshire after which he joined the Gla Thandi Thandi Pawansgow Academy for higher studies.
  • Finally, in 1862 he cleared the Indian civil services exam and became a Civil Servant in India.

Study the NCERT Notes on Charter Act of 1813 here.

FREEMentorship Program by
Ravi Kapoor, Ex-IRS
UPSC Exam-Hacker, Author, Super Mentor, MA
100+ Success Stories
Key Highlights
Achieve your Goal with our mentorship program, offering regular guidance and effective exam strategies.
Cultivate a focused mindset for exam success through our mentorship program.
UPSC Beginners Program

Get UPSC Beginners Program SuperCoaching @ just

₹50000

Claim for free

Recommendations of the Hunter Commission:
  • The Hunter Commission gave many recommendations relating to the primary and secondary level education in India.
  • It recommended that the prime responsibility of providing primary education should be provided to the local boards and the municipal boards.
  • This was because of the fact that the level of primary education in the British occupied territories of India was found to be poor as compared to the non-British territories.
  • Thus, it was recommended that the responsibility of providing primary education in the British occupied territories of India shall be provided to the local boards and the municipal bonds and the overall inspection must be done by the British colonial government.
  • The commission also praised the the quality of Secondary Level Education provided in the British occupied areas, particularly the region of Bengal, where the system of grants-in-aid was in operation.
  • Under this system, the government provided financial aid to set up schools to the private institutions.
  • Therefore, it was recommended that the responsibility of the secondary schools should be handed over to the private enterprises in a phase wise manner and the government should provide the monetary grants-in-aid for the same.
  • This Commission also recommended to follow a principle of ‘Payments by Results’ to provide the grant in aid for the setup and functioning of the schools.
  • It recommended that a greater emphasis must be paid on providing moral and physical education in the schools to develop the character and personality of the students studying in the schools.
  • The introduction of physical education and the various games would also imbibe in students qualities like discipline, teamwork and leadership skills in the students.
  • For this, it was recommended that the professors and the principal of the various schools should provide lectures on moral education to the students.
  • It was also recommended to provide vocational and literary training at the secondary education level. 
  • It was also recommended that adequate facilities should be provided to the female students to secure their educational rights.
  • Moreover, the quality of education provided to the Religious minorities like Muslims should be improved Drastically.

Study the NCERT Notes on Regulating Act of 1773 here.

Significance of the Hunter Commission:
  • The recommendations of the Hunter Commission played a key role in significantly improving the level and quality of primary and secondary level education in India.
  • The grants-in-aid system adopted by the Government to set up secondary level schools which were managed by the private institutions, helped in enhancing the reach of educational rights to the students.
  • This in turn helped to improve the quality of education in India by providing educational rights to the socially downtrodden sections of the society like human religious minorities and backward communities, etc.

Checkout the test series for UPSC IAS Exam here.

We hope that all your doubts regarding the Hunter Commission will be cleared after going through this article. You can download the Testbook App now to check out various other topics relevant to the UPSC IAS Exam.

More Articles for IAS Preparation

Hunter Commission FAQs

The Hunter Commission was formed in 1882 under the chairmanship of Sir William Hunter.

This Commission was appointed by Lord Ripon who was the viceroy of India in 1882. This Commission was officially formed on 3rd April 1882 after a request was received by Lord Ripon from the general Council of Education to form a Commission to give recommendations on the education sector in India.

The Hunter Commission gave many recommendations relating to primary and secondary level education in India. It recommended that the prime responsibility of providing primary education should be provided to the local boards and the municipal boards. This was because of the fact that the level of primary education in the British-occupied territories of India was found to be poor as compared to the non-British territories. Thus, it was recommended that the responsibility of providing primary education in the British occupied territories of India shall be provided to the local boards and the municipal bonds and the overall inspection must be done by the British colonial government.

The recommendations of the Hunter Commission played a key role in significantly improving the level and quality of primary and secondary level education in India. The grants-in-aid system adopted by the Government to set up secondary level schools which were managed by the private institutions helped in enhancing the reach of educational rights to the students. This in turn helped to improve the quality of education in India by providing educational rights to the socially downtrodden sections of the society like human religious minorities and backward communities, etc.

Sir William Hunter was an Indian Civil Servant and also a member of the viceroy's Executive Council. He was born on 15th July 1840 in Glasgow, Scotland and he obtained his education from the ‘Quicker Seminary’ at Queenswood, Hampshire after which he joined the Gla Thandi Thandi Pawansgow Academy for higher studies. Finally, in 1862 he cleared the Indian civil services exam and became a Civil Servant in India.

The commission also praised the quality of Secondary Level Education provided in the British occupied areas, particularly the region of Bengal, where the system of grants-in-aid was in operation. Under this system, the government provided financial aid to set up schools for private institutions. Therefore, it was recommended that the responsibility of the secondary schools should be handed over to the private enterprises in a phase-wise manner and the government should provide the monetary grants in aid for the same. This Commission also recommended following a principle of ‘Payments by Results’ to provide the grant in aid for the setup and functioning of the schools. It recommended that a greater emphasis must be paid to providing moral and physical education in the schools to develop the character and personality of the students studying in the schools. For this, it was recommended that the professors and the principal of the various schools should provide lectures on moral education to the students.

Report An Error