Testbook Logo
ExamsSuperCoachingLive ClassesFREETest SeriesPrevious Year PapersSkill AcademyPassPass ProPass Elite Rank PredictorIAS PreparationPracticeGK & Current AffairsDoubtsBlog
Pass Pro Max logo

FREE

Download the Testbook App,

For FREE 7 days of
Pass Pro Max!

Exams
Tests
SuperSuper
SuperPass

Refutation of Idealism​: UGC NET Philosophy Notes & Study Material

At its core, refutation of idealism is a strategy in arguing that Moore uses to knock down the idealistic claims. Idealism comes in different guises, and one of its manifestations is the claim that reality is fundamentally mental or that our perceptions and ideas make up the entire world. Idealism is the belief that everything around us, including the world, exists only in our minds. Philosophers argued that the things we see and experience do not exist, but just exist in our thoughts. George Edward Moore, among others, disagreed with such an argument. They said the world outside of our minds exists and lives by its own merit. According to Moore, our senses are credible enough to believe what's real. He argued that even if we can't prove everything, we know the world exists because we can see and touch it. Moore believed in the reality of the external world and thought idealism was wrong. He showed that the world isn't just a dream or thought. His simple argument was based on what we can experience every day. Moore's rejection of idealism reminded us to trust the world outside our minds.

Refutation of idealism is a vital topic to be studied for the philosophy related exam such as the UGC NET Philosophy.

In this article the readers will be able to know about the following:

  • Introduction of Refutation of Idealism
  • Explanation of GE Moore Refutation of Idealism
  • Moore Refutation of Idealism Summary

Introduction of Refutation of Idealism

Arguing against the idea that everything exists only in our minds is called the refutation of idealism. Idealism says that the world we see and experience is not real, but just a part of our thoughts. Some philosophers believed against this idea because they think that the world outside us is real. G.E. Moore was one of the philosophers who argued against idealism. He considered that the world exists whether we think about it or not. According to Moore, our senses prove the world we are surrounded with is real as we can see and touch the things. The simple argument that Moore presented showed people that there's more to the world than their imagination in the mind.

Refutation of Idealism

Promo Banner

UGC NET/SET Course Online by SuperTeachers: Complete Study Material, Live Classes & More

Get UGC NET/SET - Till Dec'2025 Exam SuperCoaching @ just

259998749
🪙 Your Total Savings ₹17250

Want to know more about this Super Coaching?

People also like

CUET PG

CUET PG

20999(58% OFF)

8999 (Valid Till June 2025 Exam)

Nirnay IAS 2026 - Lakshya Batch - 3 (Hinglish)

Nirnay IAS 2026 - Lakshya Batch - 3 (Hinglish)

110000(34% OFF)

73333 (Valid for 24 Months)

UGC NET/SET & Assistant Professor/Lectureship (Combo)

UGC NET/SET & Assistant Professor/Lectureship (Combo)

43999(71% OFF)

12832 (Valid for 6 Months)

Explanation of GE Moore Refutation of Idealism

G.E. Moore was a philosopher who rejected idealism. Idealism posits that the world we see exists only in our minds and does not really exist. Moore said that the world outside us really exists and it is possible for us to be sure that such a world outside us exists because of our senses.

Moore's Simple Argument Against Idealism

Moore used the simple argument to disapprove of idealism. He held up his hands and declared, "Here are two hands." With this move, Moore showed the existence of real things in the world. He proved that the world is real because we see, touch, and feel it. According to Moore, we don't need big complicated ideas to know the truth. Our daily lives are a good enough proof that the world is more than just mere thoughts in our minds. His premise was simple, and with it, others are proved wrong that idealism was not true.

Why Moore's Refutation Matters

Moore's refutation of idealism was important because it challenged people to trust their senses. Many people believed that the world was just a dream or in their minds, but Moore disagreed. He showed that we should believe in the reality of the world because we can experience it with our senses. Moore's simple approach made it easier to understand the truth of the external world. His ideas changed the way people think about what is real. Moore's refutation made people realize that idealism doesn't explain everything we experience. It helped people trust that the world around them is real and not just in their minds.

Moore Refutation of Idealism Summary

G.E. Moore opposed idealism, which holds that the world is merely in our minds. According to him, the world outside us is real and exists independently of us. The refutation of idealism by Moore showed that we can trust our senses to know what is real.

Moore's Simple Argument

He very simply argued the world is real. He looked up at his hands and said, "Here are two hands." In that way, he demonstrated that actual objects exist outside of our minds. He argued we may believe what we see and what we touch as the proof that the world is real. Moore said that even things as simple as his hands might prove idealism wrong. His point was that we don’t need complex ideas to understand that the world exists. Moore’s argument helped people see that we can trust our everyday experiences.

Why Moore Refuted Idealism

Moore denied idealism because he felt that it failed to explain the world the way we perceive it. Idealism posits that everything is only in our minds, and Moore was of a different opinion. He thought that we should trust what we see, feel, and touch as proof of the real world. Moore proved that we can be sure the world is real through our senses. He believed that idealism makes man question what is manifest. Moore's denial cleared people's understanding of the world being only a concept or imagination. His philosophies showed the world outside of us to be actual and in existence, independent of our thought processes.

Conclusion

At the end of the discussion, Moore showed that idealism is not right. He held the belief that the world exists regardless of the fact that we are thinking or not. Moore thought that what we experience every day was evidence of a real world. He said idealism didn't make sense as he could see, touch, and feel objects around him. Moore's proof made people think that we don't have to question the actuality of our surroundings. His proof is very common and simple and results from simple perceptions. From his proof, we learned to depend on our senses when we are deciding what is real. Idealism, which says everything is just in our minds, is not the way to understand the world. Moore showed that the external world is real and exists outside of us. His ideas helped philosophers and everyday people understand reality better.

Refutation of idealism is a vital topic for the UGC NET Philosophy examination. It would help if you learn similar topics with the Testbook App.

Major Takeaways for UGC NET Aspirants

  • Introduction to Fact Value and Objectivity: Fact, value, and objectivity are some of the most important ideas that help us think clearly. A fact is something that is true and can be proven, like "Water is made of hydrogen and oxygen."
  • Fact Value and Objectivity in Philosophy
    • Fact: A fact is a true thing that has evidence to back it up.
    • Value: A value is something that matters to a person or to a group of people. 
    • Objectivity: Objectivity is a state of seeing something without personal feelings or opinions influencing the view.
  • Relation Between Fact Value and Objectivity: In many ways, there are three related and important concepts about facts, value, and objectivity, which form our understanding of the world around us. The definition of fact, for example, is known to be truths verified. "The Earth revolves around the Sun."
Refutation of Idealism​ Previous Year Questions
  1. G. E. Moore’s refutation of idealism is based on which one of the following?

Options. A. Distinction between act of awareness and object of awareness.

  1. Distinction between mind and matter.
  2. Distinction between sense and reference.
  3. Distinction between knower and the act of knowing.

Ans. A. Distinction between act of awareness and object of awareness.

Refutation of Idealism​ FAQs

Report An Error

Open this in:

Testbook LogoTestbook App
ChromeChrome
Hot Links: teen patti joy apk teen patti boss mpl teen patti